EUROMID FACTSHEET
25 JANUARY 2006

THE PALESTINIAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS, THE EU AND HAMAS

The participation and the likelihood of Hamas' strong showing in today's Palestinian parliamentary elections have raised concerns about the consequences that the Islamic militant group's entrance into politics will have on the regional and international political arenas. In the first instance, some hailed at the Hamas' participation to parliamentary elections as a definitive long-awaited recognition of the 1993 Oslo acquis, which Hamas shunned boycotting the last, and until today only, parliamentary elections, held in 1996. Others, including Israel and the US, saw the Islamic militant group's running for elections as an unacceptable oxymoron, given the group's stubbornness in keeping up its militant sworn to death profile against the state of Israel. Yet, after it was realized - by Israel on 30 October 2005 ('Israel drops Hamas vote ban call, BBC) - that letting Hamas participate was 'the best of bad options', the interest and concern of the international community turned to putting pressure on the Islamic Resistance movement to moderate its extremist tenets before it enters international politics.

What shall western executives and legislatures do if a political party that they officially regard as a terrorist organization cross the threshold and joins the government and the legislative assembly of a partner in international relations (the Palestinian National Authority and the Palestinian Legislative Council respectively)? What if this party wins the elections and controls government and assembly altogether? These questions are of particular interest and concern to the EU which, being the PA's main donor, has invested significant resources and political weight to make the most of the momentum that followed the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. In the last months, the EU launched a Border Assistance Mission at the Rafah crossing point, sent a mission to the West Bank to reform and train Palestinian police services, freed financial aid to lift Gaza's economy out of poverty and, latest in time, assisted the PA in the organization of the elections, giving financial support and sending two observation missions of more that 150 people. In the light of its major commitment to the Palestinians, the EU has an interest in assessing t its relations with the to-be elected political forces. For its controversial profile and political importance, the state of relations between the EU and the Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, is arguably the most interesting.

The Council of European Union is composed of Member States' foreign ministries and represents the EU's highest decision making body in security foreign affairs. Pursuant to Common Position number 651, adopted on 12 September 2003, the Council regards Hamas as a terrorist organization. Accordingly, the EU proscribes the group's freedom to move and to act in the Union, let alone its ability to have contacts with EU officials. In order to amend its common position and lift the group from its black list, the Council's official position requires Hamas to disarm (H.E Marc Otte, Special EU Envoy to the Middle East, EPC Policy Briefing, Brussels, 30 November 2005).

The European Commission has no exclusive competence in managing the Union's relations with third parties under the common foreign and security policy. It therefore abides by the Council's positions and acts according to them, within the sphere of its competences. As for the case at hand, the relevant DGs are the ones in charge of Justice, Freedom and Security and of External Relations and the European Neighbourhood Policy. Mr. Franco Frattini, who is the commissioner responsible for the former, is competent to control terrorist organizations' affairs within the EU area. In 2003, in the capacity of Italy's Foreign Affairs Ministry, Mr. Frattini chaired the EU Council which agreed to put Hamas in the EU's black list. As of today, Mr. Frattini remains opposed to a rehabilitation of the status of Hamas and to ease restrictions on the Islamic group's freedom of movement in the EU. The Commissioner maintains that the Palestinian group should categorically renounce violence and give up the bid to destroy Israel before a revision of its status can be envisioned (Interview with Corriere della Sera, 19 April 2005).

Under the direction of Commissioner for External relations and Neighborhood Policy Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the EU assists the Palestinian Authority with large financial aid. The incumbent Palestinian elections could not have taken place without the EU, which spent €18.5 million for it (including the observation missions sent in January of 2005). Speaking at the press conference in Jerusalem on 17 January 2006, the Commissioner also announced the launch of four new energy and environment infrastructure projects in Gaza worth €20 million; in addition she made known a second payment of €1.5 million to provide x-ray machines, metal detectors, computers and other equipment to the EU Mission at Rafah. However, echoing the concerns of Javier Solana, EU's Foreign Affairs representative, the Commissioner suggested that the EU would not be able to keep up the allocation of taxpayers' money to the Palestinian Authority (PA), should a new Palestinian government adopt aggressive attitudes.

The European Parliament is by its own nature the principal guarantor that EU taxpayers' money is not misused. In addition, the ballot in the Palestinian Territories will bring into being the counterpart of the EP, that Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC). The EP sent an observation mission to the Palestinian elections with the task to ensure that elections are run in a free and democratic manner. The European assembly has also mulled over the consequences that a victory of Hamas will have on the future of the relations with the Palestinians. Although it has not issued a common declaration about it, as of today, fifty-nine members of the European Parliament have expressed their concerns in an open letter which has been sent to the Palestinian Electoral Commission. The letter, drafted by Patrick Gaubert (France, EPP-ED), Bronislaw Geremek (Poland, ALDE), Vytautas Landsbergis (Lithuania, EPP-ED), Marek Maciej Siwiec (Poland, PSE), Cristiana Muscardini (Italy, UEN), Frédérique Ries (Belgium, ALDE) and Charles Tannock (United Kingdom, EPP-ED) calls on all the candidates standing for elections 'to sign a document in which they commit themselves to the peace process, based on the principle of two states for two peoples, recognizing Israel's right to exist, renouncing violence and refraining from terror activities and committing to disarmament'. The letter, which praises the Palestinian Authority and the Electoral Committee for the efforts made to guarantee a democratic electoral process, also calls 'on the groups and parties wishing to participate in the elections (especially Hamas) to show their willingness to become part of a genuinely democratic political environment by disarming the militias and by ensuring their Charter does not include articles calling for the destruction of the state of Israel and advocating anti-Semitism.

EM

Designed for Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0 - Screen Resolution 1024x768 - www.europeanistitute.info®, web-designer and web-master: Erik Fattorelli (errego@hotmail.com)